LIHU’E — The Kaua’i County Council is proposing to float up to $28.4 million in bonds for 13 construction projects, including a new facility to house the Kaua’i police department, the county Civil Defense Office and the county Prosecutor’s Office.
LIHU’E — The Kaua’i County Council is proposing to float up to $28.4 million
in bonds for 13 construction projects, including a new facility to house the
Kaua’i police department, the county Civil Defense Office and the county
Prosecutor’s Office.
Estimated cost of the facility, which has been delayed
for lack of funding for many years, is $15 million, the largest of the proposed
projects.
The county is proposing the bond float for the complex because
state funds are not available, county officials have said.
If the bond
issue is approved, the money will be used to build the new facility and to
upgrade other facilities.
No one appeared to testify at a public hearing on
the bond issue Wednesday.
In addition to the police/civil
defense/prosecutor complex, other projects include:
* Lihu’e Civic Center.
$1.4 million for repair work the Federal Emergency Management Agency deemed
wasn’t related to Hurricane Iniki damage.
* Kekaha Landfill. $1.4
million.
* Roadway for the new emergency operating center. $350,000.
Lihu’e Civic Center renovation work. $454,000.
* A computer system for the
county’s Real Property Tax Division. $1.9 million.
* Puhi metal recycling
center. $300,000.
* Brennecke Beach shoreline protection. $500,000.
Improvements to the main pavilion at Lydgate Park. $200,000.
* American
with Disabilities Act work at the Historic County Building. $500,000.
American with Disabilities Act work on curbs. $1.6 million.
* American with
Disabilities Act work at the Wailua Golf Course restrooms. $200,000.
Project contingency funds. $1.2 million.
The amount for projects could be
higher or lower, depending on the interest rates related to the bond, Council
Chair Ron Kouchi said. The bonds will be repaid through a debt service
fund.
The county also proposes to float a $4 million bond for water
projects that will be repaid with county Water Department funds.
In other
matters, the Council’s Planning Committee deferred action on Wailua Falls
Gallery’s request to rezone its property in Kapaia from residential and open
use to neighborhood commercial use.
Committee members said the proposal is
charged with controversy and wants to study it further before sending it to the
full Council for a vote.
Located across the street from each other on Kuhio
Highway in Kapaia, Wailua Falls and the Kapaia Trading Company sell cigars,
cigar boxes and art work.
Kapaia Trading obtained neighborhood commercial
zoning earlier this year and has challenged a Wailua Falls bid to do the
same.
The Kaua’i Planning Commission recommended denial of Wailua Falls’
initial request to rezone its property for general commercial use.
The
Council subsequently amended the request for neighborhood commercial use, a
less intense use.
But Kaua’i attorney Harold Bronstein, who represents the
Kapaia Trading, said the Council has the authority to only accept or reject the
Planing Commission’s denial, and not act on an alternate zoning.
“I think,
procedurally, how you reach this point is incorrect,” Bronstein said.
But the Council committee is acting appropriately and has not violated any
procedures, said Deputy County Attorney Amy Esaki.
Council Chair Ron Kouchi
and councilmembers Billy Swain and James Tokioka said granting the zoning
request will only help small companies that create products on Kaua’i, like
Wailua Falls and Kapa’a Trading, stay in business.
Bronstein said the
Wailua Falls lot was designated by the county for residential use, but
councilmembers Daryl Kaneshiro and Swain said the lot has been used for
commercial use for years and should continue to be used in such a manner.
Bronstein also said the county would be engaging in spot zoning if it granted
the request, a claim rejected by the Council.
In a lawsuit filed in Circuit
Court, Carl asked a state judge for a court order to stop Wailua Falls from
operating until the company had secured the permits.
The judge denied the
request for a preliminary injunction, but the case is still pending.