Those seniors who worked and based their retirement savings on the assumption that they would receive their full Social Security benefits in addition to their taxed gains on private investments – whether these investments be via company pension plans, personal
Those seniors who worked and based their retirement savings on the assumption
that they would receive their full Social Security benefits in addition to
their taxed gains on private investments – whether these investments be via
company pension plans, personal savings or the mattresses on which they sleep –
are being treated by the government as suckers.
Because seniors worked hard
and did the right thing, our government rewards them with backdoor
means-testing of their Social Security benefits. This is true for today’s
seniors and mey be even more true for tomorrow’s seniors.
Under current
law, Social Security beneficiaries are required to pay income tax on 50 percent
to 85 percent of their benefits if their income surpasses modest levels. For
instance, a retired single woman surviving on $34,000 a year is forced to pay
income tax on up to 85 percent of her benefits, regardless of the money she
spends on food, utilities, the ever-increasing cost of prescription medication,
or even gifts for her newborn grandchild. She is hardly what anyone surviving
on that amount of money would call wealthy.
Even more outrageous is the
serious financial hardship this taxation creates on senior citizens who are
forced to work past retirement to maintain a decent standard of living. In this
new era of budget surplus politics, where tax-cut proposals are being seriously
considered, there is no reason the federal government needs to jeopardize the
retirement security of these senior citizens by continuing to tax their
benefits.
About 12.5 million seniors currently pay taxes on their Social
Security benefits. Until the taxation of Social Security is repealed, this
number will get bigger as the years go by, affecting the retirement security of
baby boomers, generation Xers and others. The income thresholds that trigger
benefit taxation are not indexed for inflation. Therefore, each year, more
seniors would be swept up in this effective means test because inflation pushes
them over this income threshold.
Social Security benefits taxation is a
form of means-testing in a system that was not intended to be means-tested.
Whether an individual is living the American dream and is as successful as Bill
Gates or just living above the poverty line, all benefits are calculated on the
same formula-not total income. By taxing benefits, the government makes fools
out of people who played by the rules: Retirees who planned their investment
and retirement strategies on the assumption that they would receive their full
promised Social Security benefits.
Even the 1994-96 Advisory Council on
Social Security unanimously agreed that Social Security should not be
means-tested. In its report, the council stated, “The council rejects the
further proposition that Social Security should also condition benefits on
assets or other income at retirement-conventionally known as means-testing.
“The fact that benefits are paid without regard to a beneficiary’s current
income and assets is the crucial principle that allows – in fact, encourages –
people to add savings to their Social Security benefits and makes it feasible
for employees and employers to establish supplementary pension
plans.”
Through the taxation of Social Security benefits, the government is
effectively punishing those who prepared for their retirement based on the
three-legged stool approach to retirement savings: Social Security,
employment-based pension plans and personal savings. Today’s workers are, ever
increasingly, working outside of Social Security to build retirement savings
through 401(k)s and other savings mechanisms. By basing taxation of one leg on
the performance of other legs, the government is reneging on a promise made in
1935.
Congress and the president should end the Social Security benefits
tax. Just because people work hard and prepare for their future, the government
should not be able to cut one of the legs of retirment security out from under
them.
Charles Hardin is president of Council for Government Reform, a
grassroots organization that claims more than 500,000 active, mostly senior
supporters. The organization can be reached at 3124 N. Tenth St., Arlington, VA
22201, (703) 243-7400 or www.govreform.org