The pandemic has left many people “accepting government assistance,” a place they never thought they’d be.
We all know someone who has suffered an unexpected illness, job loss or death in the family that’s left them struggling to pay their bills. For many, this was a realization that forces beyond our control can turn our housing security upside down, no matter how responsible we were.
There is a critical lifeline to keep our friends, neighbors, and sometimes ourselves from becoming houseless: It’s called Section 8.
Unfortunately, if you’ve looked for a home to rent lately, you will notice that some of them advertise ”No Section 8” or “No HUD.”
According to affordablehousingonline.com: “The Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program is a federal rental-assistance program that helps low-income renters pay a portion of their income for rent. Program participants choose their own unit to use the voucher and pay 30% to 40% of the household’s adjusted monthly income toward rent. The rest is paid directly to the landlord by the Public Housing Agency that manages the household’s voucher.”
There’s often a waiting list, but those in need should contact the County Housing Agency to determine if assistance is available.
But, making it to the top of the waiting list is only half the battle, because voucher-holders are often told that they are not welcome to apply for homes advertised for rent. The reason? Because the landlord has chosen not to even consider renting to a person who utilizes a voucher.
For the lucky ones, this discrimination means spending more time doubled up with friends, or maybe even in a homeless shelter. For others, it means they are out in the cold, waiting for some landlord to give them a chance.
Imagine if landlords refused to accept renters whose primary income was Social Security. Imagine if grocery stores refused to accept EBT.
It’s flat-out wrong, and discrimination against renters based on their voucher status should be prohibited by law.
In fact, in at least 13 states, including California and the District of Columbia, it is against the law. These states and numerous municipalities have passed laws prohibiting housing discrimination based on the source of income.
It’s time for Hawai‘i to join them.
Yes, a landlord should be able to select renters who are able to pay the rent, have a history of paying it on time, and who will take care of the property. This determination should be based, however, on the renter’s past performance and other relevant factors, not simply because they are on public assistance.
The state Legislature has repeatedly turned its back on legislation to protect houseless and low-to-middle-income working families. However, there is a simple and free way for our legislators to get serious about addressing the housing crisis: by passing a bill that fully outlaws housing-voucher discrimination.
A strong, no-nonsense measure is needed, and legislators must reject attempts to prohibit discrimination “in advertisement only,” but in reality allowing the practice to continue without penalty.
During the opening-day ceremonies that take place today, there will be talk about increasing Hawai‘i’s minimum wage, paid family leave and affordable housing. We must also make sure that housing cannot be denied to our neighbors who need vouchers as we work toward our goal of “one job should be enough.”
The chair of the Housing Committee in the House is state Rep. Nadine Nakamura, repnakamura@capitol.hawaii.gov, who represents north and east Kaua‘i, and in the Senate it’s state Sen. Stanley Chang, senchang@capitol.hawaii.gov.
Please take a moment to email and ask them to end “housing-voucher discrimination” in Hawai‘i.
•••
Gary Hooser is the former vice-chair of the Democratic Party of Hawai‘i, and served eight years in the state Senate, where he was majority leader. He also served for eight years on the Kaua‘i County Council, and was the former director of the state Office of Environmental Quality Control. He serves in a volunteer capacity as board president of the Hawai‘i Alliance for Progressive Action and is executive director of the Pono Hawai‘i Initiative.
Short version of this article: We need to increase taxes again, and again, and again to keep funding social programs that do not have required qualifications in order someone to receive TEMPORARY public assistance. If you don’t vote Democrat, your freebies and high taxes will go away.
So true, nobody wants to earn their own way anymore…sad.
Government already controls rental prices via property tax rates. Are you suggesting that government should force who it is rented to as well. How about we put all our possessions in a pile, and let government spread them evenly among everyone? I know that is extreme, but isnt that where this is headed. I trust government to do it fairly.
Actually housing discrimination only affects those rent. Homeowners have their homes and will probably never experience housing discrimination. I never have. What does affect everyone is corrupt politicians and apathetic leaders, which is why problems never get solved.
does corporate bail outs in the billions to big banks count as social programs? just wondering why nobody brings that up when crying about their tax dollars
Here is another example. Rental cars. Sure companies can and should not discriminate. I remember being 18 and no car rental company would rent to me. Should government require that car rental companies not check credit, ask for a credit card, have a deposit, control the price? What about asking for a driver’s license? Government control of businesses and individuals is a slippery slope. Government should make sure a market stays fair, and then stop.