What does the International Film Festival and Forum on Human Rights held recently in Geneva Switzerland have to do with Kauai?
Earlier this month, I was honored to be invited and to speak at this event following the screening of “Poisoning Paradise” – Executive Produced by Pierce Brosnan and Produced and Directed by Keely Shane Brosnan and Teresa Tico.
The program described the film as follows: “In their meticulously researched documentary Poisoning Paradise, film-makers recount the transformation of Hawaii from agricultural land to testing grounds for the powerful agrochemical industry and the response of many communities who are trying to reclaim their land, their health and their right to live in a safe environment.”
The panel consisted of myself, Laurent Gaberell, an expert in agriculture and biodiversity affiliated with the Swiss organization Public Eye, Baskut Tuncak, the Special Rapporteur on the human rights implications of environmentally sound management and disposal of hazardous products and wastes, and Hank Campbell of the American Council on Science and Health. The moderator was Maren Peters, a journalist and editor of the economic section for Swiss Public Radio.
While most of us working on the issue surrounding the health and environmental impacts of the agrochemical industry here in Hawaii are keenly aware of the local impacts to our communities, streams and coastal waters – it is easy to forget that this is an international issue impacting communities on every continent.
That was the takeaway. The issue of large corporations dominating the economic and governing infrastructure of communities and countries around the globe, and the fact that people in each and every one of these communities and countries are pushing back and winning in small ways and in big, was the underlying reality we all shared.
The human rights principle we were there to discuss:
“Man has the fundamental right to freedom, equality and adequate conditions of life, in an environment of a quality that permits a life of dignity and well-being, and he bears a solemn responsibility to protect and improve the environment for present and future generations.” Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment (1972), Principle 1.
The audience of several hundred and the panelists were all clearly struck by the superimposition of a “paradise island in the pacific” with the experimental fields of corn, large quantities of restricted use pesticides being used, the obvious health and environmental impacts, the refusal of the industry to even disclose the pesticides they were using, and the money and political influence the international agrochemical companies wield in our community.
It is important to note that in Switzerland, GMO crops and foods are banned. Labeling of food is not an issue because the products are simply banned. There are no experimental fields of anything growing in Switzerland. Also banned in Switzerland are the pesticides atrazine and paraquat, which are both used in copious amounts near neighborhoods, schools, parks and other public areas in Hawaii. Atrazine is responsible for polluting international waterways in Europe, is one of the largest polluters of groundwater in the western world, and shows up in Hawaii waters on a regular basis. Paraquat has been banned in 38 different countries but continues to be used along with atrazine, extensively in Hawaii.
While in Switzerland I also met with members of the Swiss Parliament, the United Nations, and various groups representing academia, activism, and the international media. Without exception, the fact that Syngenta, a Swiss based company is using chemicals in large quantities on Kauai (albeit now via Hartung Brothers) that are banned in their home country, elicited reactions of incredulousness, embarrassment and compunction.
Right or wrong in their thinking, what seems so outrageous to people everywhere who hear our story is that it is happening here in the jewel of the pacific, ostensibly in America, the richest and most powerful country in the world. And it is not lost upon them that the people that suffer most from the abuses of these companies, are the indigenous people who once governed the lands upon which these poisons are now being sprayed.
•••
Gary Hooser formerly served in the state Senate, where he was majority leader. He also served for eight years on the Kauai County Council and was former director of the state Office of Environmental Quality Control. He serves presently in a volunteer capacity as board president of the Hawaii Alliance for Progressive Action (HAPA) and is executive director of the Pono Hawaii Initiative.
Switzerland! HA! Wasn’t it Europe that murdered 6 million people during my lifetime because they thought them inferior and a danger to society? So just because one country says something, not backed by science, doesn’t mean it has any validity at all. But then it’s a Swiss company that is one leader in the GMO food technology. Go figure. Can’t wait for the very level-headed and informed Joan Conrow to answer your latest wild claims here.
Another Hooser lie: “the refusal of the industry to even disclose the pesticides they were using.” BS! They’ve been voluntarily disclosing for 4 years now.
Hooser is spreading misinformation. GMO food is not banned in Switzerland. The country also allows GM experimental field crops and will allow GM crop cultivation in certain zones starting in 2021.
To Amused: The truth is the companies continue to refuse full disclosure. Try asking them how much RoundUp or glyphosate related products they use. They will not tell you. They claim it is oh so safe, yet they refuse to inform the public even as to the annual amounts they use. They also will not disclose their experimental pesticide permits, nor will they disclose a wide variety of other general use pesticides of which they use large amounts of. They disclose what they want, when they want…or not as they see fit. There is no verification, no oversight and no accountability.
GMO foods are not banned in Switzerland, but they are labeled. The Swiss government is currently funding research on GMO crops in India and plans to begin allowing Swiss farmers to grow GMO crops in certain zones, starting in 2021. Experimental GMO field trials also are permitted in Switzerland. Furthermore, while Switzerland may not use paraquat and atrazine, it does export these products, so if it’s being held up as a role model, let’s consider that hypocrisy. I would also challenge the claim that there are “obvious health and environmental impacts” associated with seed crops in Hawaii. Not a single impact has ever been documented. Indeed, the most recent water studies on Kauai and Oahu showed pesticide residues far below levels that can cause harm.
“There are no experimental fields…” is an accurate statement. Gmo’s Banned in Switzerland at least until 2021. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/genetically-modified-organisms_government-approves-gmo-ban-extension/42260828
“Manawai”, “Amused”, and Joan Conrow all come off as shills for the Seed Corn//Pesticide and herbicide testing companies as they try to poke holes in Mr. Hooser’s level-headed and and well-informed stance on the poisoning of our paradise.
If you look up “shill” in the dictionary, you’ll see a picture of organic farmer kauaiboy supporting the $30 billion dollar corporate european organic industry which pays to produce the outright lies and propaganda you encounter in the media, the film mentioned in this article and everything coming from the computers of kauaiboy and Hooser.
No, “There are no experimental fields” is NOT an accurate statement:
https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2016/11/01/switzerland-approves-field-trial-of-gmo-wheat/
It’s the commercial cultivation that won’t be allowed until 2021. Experimental field trials can and are being conducted.
As for Kauaiboy, yawn…. the shill charge always comes out when you have no actual facts to share.
Fascinating how there is no cry for the termite and pest control companies to disclose their use, even though they are the largest users of pesticides in the state. Also, there’s no call for the Nature Conservancy and other groups using glyphosate in the back country to disclose their use, or the state and county, or golf courses and resorts. Only ag is targeted.