The salary commission should set salaries by job classifications and not by individual performances. We should not hold grudges on a personal basis that carry on and penalize future administrations. If this is done, I do not think that we
The salary commission should set salaries by job classifications and not by
individual performances. We should not hold grudges on a personal basis that
carry on and penalize future administrations. If this is done, I do not think
that we cut salaries if individuals do not perform — we remove them and save
the position.
In the private sector, a job position is rated accordingly by
dollars and cents. Applicants either accept the salary offered or look
elsewhere. If individuals accept and cannot do the job, he or she is removed or
transferred — it’s like saying, “We respect the job position and expect the
employee to do the job.”
Once again, job position should be the focus for
salary evaluations — personal grudges carry on if we put too much emphasis on
individuals, thereby penalizing future administrations.
Public workers’
salaries are settled by arbitration or contracts and can be settled by proper
finances scheduling over a period of time, retroactively. Unions should show
tolerance and patience. If government does not have the monies to pay on demand
— they should be more concerned about job security.
Also, something is
drastically wrong when an employee receives a higher salary than his or her
superiors by position.
We cannot set future budgets accurately if we do not
know job ratings and finance requirements ahead of time.
We always say,
“Now is not the time — when IS the right time? In the meantime,
administrations come and go and we have not corrected the system.
We have
many qualified personnel in our county government and we should not spend as
much money hiring consultants whose plans are shelved and filed for future use
— sometimes never!
Phil Laverly
Kapa’a