Welcome!
    |
    ||
    Logout|My Dashboard
  • Subscribe

council Council wants TVR enforcement to step up

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, March 1, 2013 12:30 am

LIHU‘E — The head of the Planning Department took a lashing from the Kaua‘i County Council Wednesday for using funds earmarked for enforcement of transient vacation rentals in a different manner than approved by the council in 2012 and refusing to reveal additional details publicly.

“We’re talking about enforcement,” Councilman Mel Rapozo said. “It just sounds like we have decided not to go after these guys and that’s what’s bothering me. We’re a laughing stock.”

During the budget review sessions in April and May of last year, the council set aside $30,000 for the Planning Department to hire two retired police officers, on an 89-day contract each, to investigate potentially illegal TVRs functioning outside the Visitor Destination Area.

“This is what the council said we wanted and that is what you agreed to,” Rapozo said to Planning Director Michael Dahilig.

After Fiscal Year 2013 started July 1, and the money was in the department’s hands, Dahilig decided to use it in a different manner. From a budgetary standpoint, he said, it was not appropriate for the department to whittle down the funds and not get the “bang-for-the-buck type of situation.”

If the department used the money in the way that it was provided for, it would only be able to go after one or two illegal TVRs, based on some of the quotes that the department got, according to Dahilig.

So instead, Dahilig said he used the funds to create partnerships between the Kaua‘i Police Department and the Office of Prosecuting Attorney to help assist his department and train his staff to be at a level where they could provide “evidentiary support” to bring enforcement situations to a contested case.

Dahilig said the department has been using the $30,000 for enforcement and there is a plan for it. But just how exactly the money is being used, he would not disclose to the council unless they met behind closed doors, away from the public’s view.

“Given the sensitivity of how that money is going to be used, it’s something that I would not like to reveal in public,” Dahilig said.

Council Chair Jay Furfaro had additional concerns on how the department handled a decision to change the manner in which it is using the $30,000. He said there are only two opportunities for a county agency to change the intent of funds approved for capital improvement projects. One opportunity is during the budget review sessions, which extend for about six weeks in April and May. The other is to come before the council with a money bill.

“Those are the rules, and we control the purse strings,” said Furfaro, adding that it would have made a lot more sense for Dahilig to have a discussion with the council before changing the purpose of the money in the budget.

Since the council passed Ordinance 904, the department grandfathered TVRs that were operating in agricultural lands.

“I don’t think I’m revealing any top-secret information, but we have 91 of these TVRs that have failed to comply with renewals, and continue operations,” said Furfaro, asking Dahilig if the owners have been cited. “Is that a concern, yes or no?”

Dahilig said the bulk of the TVRs are being processed, and about a third of them has been issued a notice of compliance.

TVR owners who are not in compliance are first given a notice to comply, and if no action is taken to correct the situation, the department can make a determination to seek an order to show cause before the Kaua‘i Planning Commission, which to trigger a contested case to revoke the permit, according to Dahilig.

A revocation could potentially be appealable in the 5th Circuit Court, which is a similar situation happening with the revocation of permits for Coco Palms in Wailua Beach, he said.

On Feb. 19, blogger Joan Conrow started a series called “Abuse Chronicles” at www.kauaieclectic.blogspot.com, in which she exposes several irregularities — backed up by public documents — with TVRs outside VDAs and heavily criticizes how the department has been handling enforcement.

Rapozo said he read the blogs after it was brought up to his attention.

“I think we need to do something, because it really doesn’t make this county look good,” he said.

To him, the county decided not to enforce TVRs, he said, and needs to change this picture and quickly.

“My question is, are we moving forward … to actively and aggressively go after these violators?” Rapozo said.

Dahilig’s answer was yes.

Council members discussed on whether to go into executive session to discuss enforcement details.  

Deputy County Attorney Ian Jung said he doesn’t think that specific policies and operational tactics of investigation is something the council wants to reveal in public. Jung said there is a due process in place. The county may have authority to fine, but the owners also have authority to appeal.

County Attorney Al Castillo said nothing was being done in secrecy. The “very questions” that all council members were asking would easily be answered in executive session, Castillo said.

By a 4-2 vote, the council voted to go behind closed doors. Rapozo and Hooser cast the dissenting votes. Councilman Tim Bynum was absent at the meeting Wednesday. After emerging from executive session Furfaro said the issue will be back on the agenda, probably at the end of March.

© 2016 Thegardenisland.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • DebraKekaualua posted at 7:52 pm on Fri, Mar 1, 2013.

    DebraKekaualua Posts: 465

    Heller Mel and Jay, Really? Not up on TVRs, but my opinion is that Transient Vacation Rentals should not have government intruding on owners. In the 70s, many of us had extra spaces in our homes, ohana quarters, granny's quarters, and meditation rooms helping pad very low wages, tourist industry etc. Then two hurricanes later, these same areas, aka TVRs are under scrutiny because the government isn't getting their money share. Government is the one that has been overspending, most of us not so much, and with Fed cuts imminent, good luck on seeing any "enforcement", There just aren't enough police to tag drivers, much less half of the laws on the books, and it looks like county will go bankrupt with several court hearings and frivolous lawsuits. Insatiably, government intrusion is becoming more big brother like. Divine Intervention requested.

     
  • mrb posted at 9:30 am on Fri, Mar 1, 2013.

    mrb Posts: 153

    CLARITY, TRANSPARENCY, ACCOUNTABILITY.

    These basic standards must be met.

     
  • Kupuna posted at 7:54 am on Fri, Mar 1, 2013.

    Kupuna Posts: 5

    For decades county administrators including the Mayor had demonstrated "ineffective and just plain stupid" mentality. These kind of actions taken without compliant or "respect" to protocol will continue down this road to shame unless proper protocol are followed. We teach this to the children why is it adults don't "get it"?

    Shame on the Planning Director and THANKYOU Mel Rapozo and Jay Furfaro for bringing this matter to the forefront. Good job!


    Kupuna

     
  • dakine posted at 6:44 am on Fri, Mar 1, 2013.

    dakine Posts: 611

    Thaqt's just the problem...everything of substance is being kept secret. What can be so sensitive about TVR enforcement that it has to be secret? You go look at the property, you look at the documents of record, you look at the applicable laws, and you file or don't file. The details Ms. Conrow has been disclosing are all public record, and clearly lean toward present enforcement simply not being done, either as a result of incompetence or (perhaps) graft. You want to not be a laughing stock? Bring it into the open and deal with it directly.

     

Online poll

Loading…

Most Popular

Follow us on Facebook